User talk:Missvain
 | Missvain (talk) is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 | Missvain is currently experiencing significant stress that may affect her ability to work on Wikipedia. She may choose to work in quieter areas and avoid complicated tasks or areas prone to conflict. She may also respond to talk page or email messages more slowly than usual, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
 |
The Drama Llama is Watching You |
| The owner of this page reserves the right to delete trolling and drama at their discretion. |
Women in Red June 2024[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This Month in GLAM: May 2024[edit]
| ||||||
New article -- regulatory agenda[edit]
Dear MissVain --
You seem like a serious reviewer. For the first time in several years, I wrote a new article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_agenda I really don't want to go through the review process with reviewers that don't know what they're talking about. (A biographical article necessarily talks about what the person did. That doesn't make it "a resume." A Wikipedia guideline that uses "should" doesn't mean "must." And the like. That kind of malarky has kept me out of the writing game for about two years.)
Could you give regulatory agenda a real review, and if there's anything that needs attention, let me know? And if not, do whatever has to be done to keep it out of the hands of less-helpful reviewers?
If you don't want to do it yourself, can you point me in a direction that will get me to a serious and helpful reviewer?